Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 14:32

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Brad Pitt Wears a Cobalt Blue Velvet Blazer and Barrel Jeans with Ines de Ramon - instyle.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Should The Braves Consider Offers On Chris Sale? - MLB Trade Rumors
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Yvette Cooper yet to agree deal three days before spending review - BBC
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Invitation from Google hints at earlier than expected Pixel 10 release - PhoneArena
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Stunning Images Reveal The Sun's Surface in Unprecedented Detail - ScienceAlert
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
TSA shares travel warning for Costco members - TheStreet
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
America’s Small Businesses Hopeful of Boost From Trump’s Spending Bill - WSJ
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.